Jw. Davis et al., Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: Differencesbased on treatment modality, J UROL, 166(3), 2001, pp. 947-952
Purpose: Brachytherapy with (103)palladium ((103) Pd) is an increasingly ad
ministered treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. We compared ge
neral and disease specific health related quality of life after Pd-103 trea
tment, radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy given duri
ng the same time frame.
Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional survey
study of patients treated at a single community medical center between 1995
and 1999. We mailed 5 validated health related quality of life survey inst
ruments to 269, 142 and 222 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, Pd-103
treatment and external beam radiation therapy, respectively, with a respon
se rate of greater than 80% in all groups.
Results: General health related quality of life assessed by the SF-36 showe
d the same scores in patients who underwent prostatectomy and Pd-103 treatm
ent. The University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was use
d to assess bowel, urinary and sexual function/bothersomeness. External bea
m radiation therapy reported was associated with worse bowel function and g
reater bowel bothersomeness. Prostatectomy was associated with worse urinar
y function compared to Pd-103 and external beam radiation therapy. Prostate
ctomy was associated with worse sexual function than Pd-103 or external bea
m radiation therapy, although nerve sparing surgery and erectile aids minim
ized the difference. American Urological Association symptom scores were in
itially higher for Pd-103 but became equal to those in the other groups in
patients treated greater than 12 months from survey time. Disease-free men
who underwent prostatectomy and Pd-103 brachytherapy were equally confident
that cancer would not recur in the future. Satisfaction rates were equival
ent and biochemical failure significantly decreased satisfaction in all gro
ups.
Conclusions: While general health related quality of life was mostly unaffe
cted by the 3 most common treatments for prostate cancer, there were differ
ences in bowel, urinary and sexual function. This information may aid patie
nts in the decision making process.