Js. Matsumura et al., Identification and implications of transgraft microleaks after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms, J VASC SURG, 34(2), 2001, pp. 190-197
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Purpose: The purpose of this report is to describe an interesting cause of
endoleak and detail-specific techniques for identifying small transgraft de
fects, which we have termed microleaks.
Methods. Four patients underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic an
eurysms with modular nitinol/polyester endoprostheses and were studied afte
r 6 to 30 months. All patients were enrolled in standard follow-up radiogra
phic surveillance protocols.
Results: Three of the four abdominal aortic aneurysms continued to expand a
fter endograft repair. Standard computed tomography imaging with precontras
t, dynamic contrast, and delayed imaging frequently identifies endoleak, al
though it fails to precisely identify microleaks as the source. Color flow
duplex ultrasound scan was performed on three patients and perigraft "jets,
" small areas of color flow adjacent to the endograft, were identified in a
ll. Microleaks were identified in one patient who underwent digital subtrac
tion axteriography with directed efforts to completely opacify the prosthes
is lumen and multiple oblique projections. In another patient, contrast art
eriography with balloon occlusion of the distal endograft clearly depicted
midgraft microleaks that might otherwise be mistaken for graft porosity or
cuff junction endoleaks. No microleaks were diagnosed on angiograms when th
ese directed efforts were not performed. Aneurysm exploration before aortic
clamping provided conclusive determination of the presence of blood flow t
hrough the wall of the endoprosthesis in two patients.
Conclusions: Microleaks occur up to 2.5 years after endovascular repair of
aortic aneurysms. Although computed tomography demonstrates the presence of
an endoleak in these patients, the exact site of origin usually remains ob
scure. Doppler ultrasound scan and directed arteriography appear to be of g
reater utility for identifying the presence and location of microleaks. Bal
loon occlusion arteriography and aneurysm exploration without arterial clam
ping provide definitive evidence of microleaks. Although the clinical signi
ficance of microleaks remains unclear, long-term monitoring of patients is
imperative to diagnose and treat these and other modes of endograft failure
before they progress to aneurysm rupture.