Cn. Schutz et A. Warshel, What axe the dielectric "constants" of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?, PROTEINS, 44(4), 2001, pp. 400-417
Implicit models for evaluation of electrostatic energies in proteins includ
e dielectric constants that represent effect of the protein environment. Un
fortunately, the results obtained by such models are very sensitive to the
value used for the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the factors that deter
mine the optimal value of these constants are far from being obvious. This
review considers the meaning of the protein dielectric constants and the wa
ys to determine their optimal values. It is pointed out that typical benchm
arks for validation of electrostatic models cannot discriminate between con
sistent and inconsistent models. In particular, the observed pK(a) values o
f surface groups can be reproduced correctly by models with entirely incorr
ect physical features. Thus, we introduce a discriminative benchmark that o
nly includes residues whose pK(a) values are shifted significantly from the
ir values in water. We also use the semimacroscopic version of the protein
dipole Langevin dipole (PDLD/S) formulation to generate a series of models
that move gradually from microscopic to fully macroscopic models. These inc
lude the linear response version of the PDLD/S models, Poisson Boltzmann (P
B)-type models, and Tanford Kirkwwod (TK)-type models. Using our different
models and the discriminative benchmark, we show that the protein dielectri
c constant, epsilon (p), is not a universal constant but simply a parameter
that depends on the model used. It is also shown in agreement with our pre
vious works that epsilon (p) represents the factors that are not considered
explicitly. The use of a discriminative benchmark appears to help not only
in identifying nonphysical models but also in analyzing effects that are n
ot reproduced in an accurate way by consistent models. These include the ef
fect of water penetration and the effect of the protein reorganization. Fin
ally, we show that the optimal dielectric constant for self-energies is not
the optimal constant for charge-charge interactions. Proteins 2001; 44:400
-417. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss,Inc.