For the diagnostic work-up of the aorta, noninvasive cross-sectional imagin
g techniques have almost replaced invasive catheter angiography. CT- and MR
-angiography are supplemented by sonography which is used predominantly for
the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm and dissections of the thoraci
c aorta. This review deals with the diagnostic approach to two disease enti
ties involving the aorta: aortic dissection and aortic occlusion.
Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE),CT- and MR-angiography (MRA) are us
ed in the assessment of aortic dissection. Published sensitivity and specif
city values regarding the detection and classification of dissections into
Stanford A and Stanford B range between 96-100% for all three modalities. R
esults for multislice CTA have not yet been reported, but can be expected t
o be at least as good. The ability to delineate additional information rega
rding the precise morphology of true and false lumen, entry and reentry-sit
es, the development of thrombus or paraaortic hematomas,as well as the asse
ssment of aortic regurgitation or involvement of coronary arteries depend o
n the chosen technique. Reflecting the ability to collect functional imagin
g data, both TEE and MRA are superior to CTA in the assessment of aortic va
lve involvement, while TEE is the modality of choice for evaluation of coro
nary arteries. Sonography is of limited use in the assessment of abdominal
dissections.
For the evaluation of patients with suspected aortic occlusion both CTA and
MRA represent the imaging modalities of choice. Both provide for a compreh
ensive and precise depiction of the underlying aortic morphology, the exten
t of collateral flow as well as delineation of distal run-off vessels. MRA
should be employed in patients with impaired renal function as paramagnetic
contrast agents are not nephrotoxic.