C. Ahiadeke et al., Breastfeeding behavior and infant survival with emphasis on reverse causation bias: Some evidence from Nigeria, SOCIAL BIOL, 47(1-2), 2000, pp. 94-113
Tbe possibility of selection bias in the estimation of the effects of breas
tfeeding on subsequent survival is implied by the clinical evidence that ch
ildren who are healthier at birth are more likely to be breastfed than thei
r less healthy counterparts who may be prone to difficulties in sustaining
breastfeeding. This paper addresses an important problem in understanding t
he association of breastfeeding and child survival with regard to reverse c
ausation. It utilizes data on the reported reason for weaning to assess the
degree to which reverse causality may be responsible for observed associat
ions. The analysis indicates that children who are weaned in the neonatal p
eriod because of illness or weakness to suckle, experience a much higher ri
sk of dying than others. This is not mainly because of the cessation of bre
astfeeding, but because of the original factor, being their illness. Any bi
ases imparted by an initial selection mechanism appear, therefore, to have
influence on the effectiveness of breastfeeding behavior.