Working Anita Bryant: The impact of Christian anti-gay activism on lesbianand gay movement claims

Authors
Citation
T. Fetner, Working Anita Bryant: The impact of Christian anti-gay activism on lesbianand gay movement claims, SOCIAL PROB, 48(3), 2001, pp. 411-428
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
SOCIAL PROBLEMS
ISSN journal
00377791 → ACNP
Volume
48
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
411 - 428
Database
ISI
SICI code
0037-7791(200108)48:3<411:WABTIO>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Social movement scholarship claims that opposing movements can create oppor tunities and generate mobilization for the other side, However, there are s till open questions as to how this influence between opposing movements ope rates on an organizational level. This paper looks closely at one aspect of the impact of opposing movements: rhetorical strategies. I examine histori cal documents produced by social movement organizations to determine the pr ocesses through which interactions between opposing movements are integrate d into the everyday work of producing movement claims, This historical anal ysis evaluates the flyers, newsletters, and press releases of lesbian and g ay movement organizations in the United States over time, comparing documen ts produced before the emergence of the Christian anti-gay counter movement in 1977, with those produced immediately following the counter movement's entry into the political scene. I analyze the shifts in lesbian and gay act ivists' claims between these two brief time periods and link these changes to the presence of Christian anti-gay activists. I find that frames, tone, and language shift for issues that were directly addressed by the Christian anti-gay movement (lesbian and gay rights), but that no similar change tva s present for issues on which the anti-gay movement remained silent (police harassment and lesbian/gay media representations). These findings support the claim that opposing movements alter the political context in which the other side works, but they also demonstrate that new opportunities produced by an opposing movement may be issue-specific rather than movement-wide.