Effects of stimulus synchrony on mechanisms of perceptual organization

When neurons adopt a synchronized, oscillatory response to stimulus Gestalt en, the phase of those oscillations almost always varies relative to stimul us activity. This has been taken to indicate that form-coding mechanisms ar e synchronized by internal timing mechanisms, and/or may be sensitive to st imulus activity only via motion detectors. This proposal is problematic for interpreting recent demonstrations of the effects of stimulus synchrony pa rticularly when stimuli are stationary. Here we offer an account of stimulu s-driven synchronization supported by evidence that segmentation by stimulu s synchrony can be relatively insensitive to explicit motion signals. The a rgument is made that qualitative similarities between the effects of phase- independent and phase-locked oscillations in the EEG, the effects of phase synchronization at the cellular level and evidence for phase-enhanced stimu lus grouping should be considered as functionally equivalent. This argument emphasizes the flexibility of temporal synchrony as a code for perceptual organization.