Despite the fact that immunohistochemistry is widely used in routine diagno
stic work and is a very common part of scientific reports in pathology and
cytology, its standardization still lags behind. Interpretation of immunost
ains should be based on microanatomic distribution of the staining, proport
ion of positively stained cells, staining intensity, if relevant, and cutof
f levels. These parameters should be shown to be reasonably reproducible an
d should be clearly defined in publications. Uniformity in the setting of t
hresholds could probably benefit from interlaboratory control materials con
taining defined amounts of the target antigen. Reliable and precise quantit
ative immunohistochemistry requires the use of control materials containing
defined amounts of the target antigen and processed alongside the specimen
combined with automated computer-assisted microspectrophotometry. Applicat
ion of these suggestions is hoped to improve standardization and to facilit
ate communication in the field of immunohistochemistry.