Ml. Matthews et al., A comparison of floral structures of Anisophylleaceae and Cunoniaceae and the problem of their systematic position, ANN BOTANY, 88(3), 2001, pp. 439-455
Flowers of Anisophyllea (Anisophylleaceae, Cucurbitales) and Ceratopetalum
(Cunoniaceae, Oxalidales) are surprisingly similar in appearance. To date,
these families have never been interpreted as closely related, and even in
present molecular (rbcL) studies they appear in different orders of eurosid
s I (APG, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85:531-553, 1998). In thi
s investigation, flowers of selected taxa of both families are morphologica
lly and anatomically compared. In addition, previous work on the two famili
es is reviewed. The results strongly emphasize the great similarity in all
floral organs. Some special similarities include the occurrence of trimerou
s flowers, isomerous organ whorls (including the gynoecium), valvate sepals
, digitate petals, obdiplostemony, incurved filaments in bud with similar a
nthers, similar pollen, similar nectaries, carpels with free styles, a cana
l in the centre of each individual carpel as well as in the centre of the e
ntire gynoecium along the symplicate zone, and similar ovules with a slit-s
haped micropyle. In addition, recently recovered Late Cretaceous floral fos
sils that share features of both families further emphasize a potential clo
se relationship. However, if more extensive molecular studies are performed
in the future that support the current disparate position of the two famil
ies, then an explanation of the biological/ functional similarities in flor
al structure should be attempted: specifically, whether this suite of Featu
res is a symplesiomorphy for basal rosids, or an autapomorphy for each fami
ly. (C) 2001 Annals of Botany Company.