Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation

Citation
Wm. Teeuwisse et al., Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation, BR J RADIOL, 74(884), 2001, pp. 720-726
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00071285 → ACNP
Volume
74
Issue
884
Year of publication
2001
Pages
720 - 726
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Patient and staff dose during CT guided coagulation of osteoid osteoma, tis sue biopsy and abcess drainage were evaluated retrospectively on a conventi onal CT scanner and prospectively on a scanner equipped with fluoroscopic C T. The computed tomography dose index (CTDI) and the individual dose equiva lent, i.e. the penetrating dose for workers at a depth of 10 mm tissue, wer e measured. Evaluation of CTDI enabled effective dose and maximum skin entr ance doses for the patient to be determined. Doses were assessed for 96 CT guided interventions, including 16 drainages with average effective doses o f 13.5 mSv and 9.3 mSv for the conventional CT scanner and the scanner with spiral CT fluoroscopy, respectively, 49 biopsies (effective doses of 8 mSv and 6.1 mSv, respectively), and 31 coagulations of osteoid osteoma (effect ive doses of 2.1 mSv and 0.8 mSv, respectively). Effective doses to patient s were in the same range as those observed for regular diagnostic CT examin ations. Entrance skin doses were well below the 2 Gy threshold for determin istic skin effects on the CT scanner equipped with fluoroscopic function (0 .03-0.33 Gy), whilst skin doses on the conventional scanner were considerab ly higher (0.09-1.61 Gy). This is mainly owing to the fact that on the conv entional scanner mAs was rarely reduced for scans evaluating needle positio n whereas low mAs per rotation was selected on the scanner with the fluoros copy option. The maximum dose to a worker measured outside the lead apron w as 28 mu Sv for one single procedure. The mean dose per procedure was below 10 mu Sv for radiologists and below 1 mu Sv for radiographers. Correcting for attenuation of the lead apron, the doses to workers are very low.