BACKGROUND. Initial studies of sentinel lymphadenectomy for patients with b
reast carcinoma confirmed that the status of the sentinel lymph nodes was a
n accurate predictor of the presence of metastatic disease in the axillary
lymph nodes. Sentinel lymphadenectomy, as an axillary staging procedure, ha
s risks of morbidity that have yet to be defined.
METHODS. Patients were enrolled in a two-phase protocol that included concu
rrent data collection of patient characteristics and treatment variables. D
uring the first (validation) phase, 72 patients underwent sentinel lymph no
de excision followed by a level I-II axillary dissection. After the techniq
ue had been established, the second phase commenced, during which only pati
ents with positive sentinel lymph nodes underwent an axillary dissection.
RESULTS. During the second phase, lymphedema was identified in 9 of 303 pat
ients (3.0%) who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy alone and in 20 of 117
patients (17.1%) who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy combined with axill
ary dissection (P < 0.0001). Of 303 patients who underwent sentinel lymphad
enectomy alone, 8 of 155 patients (5.1%) with tumors located in the upper o
uter quadrant and 1 of 148 patients (0.7%) with tumors in other locations d
eveloped lymphedema (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS. The risk of developing lymphedema after undergoing sentinel ly
mphadenectomy was measurable but significantly lower than after undergoing
axillary dissection. Tumor location in the upper outer quadrant and postope
rative trauma and/or infection were identifiable risk factors for lymphedem
a. (C) 2001 American Cancer Society.