A. Hoos et al., High Ki-67 proliferative index predicts disease specific survival in patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcomas, CANCER, 92(4), 2001, pp. 869-874
BACKGROUND. Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are heterogeneous neoplasms that ha
ve variable clinical outcome. Several clinical parameters and few molecular
markers, including Ki-67 proliferative index, have been shown to correlate
with patient prognosis. To the authors' knowledge, no definitive report ex
ists to identify one molecular marker that can be analyzed easily in a clin
ical setting and that predicts survival in a cohort of patients with high-r
isk STS of identical clinical characteristics but variable outcome.
METHODS. The influence of clinical prognostic factors was eliminated by sel
ecting two patient groups with identical high-risk characteristics: large (
> 10 cm), high-grade, deep, completely resected primary extremity STS (n =
47). Patients in the first group remained disease free (no evidence of dise
ase [NED]) after primary tumor treatment (n = 19), whereas patients in the
second group subsequently died of disease (DOD; n = 28). Triplicate 0.6-mm
core biopsies from defined morphologic areas of paraffin embedded primary t
umors were assembled on a tissue microarray and analyzed by immunohistochem
istry with the MIB-1 antibody, and Ki-67 proliferative indices were correla
ted with patient outcome.
RESULTS. High Ki-67 proliferative index, defined as greater than 30% tumor
cells showing nuclear immunoreactivity, was significantly more frequent in
the DOD group than in the NED group and was associated with tumor-related m
ortality (P = 0.02). This marker identifies an especially aggressive malign
ant phenotype within a cohort of high-risk tumors that is based on well est
ablished clinical and pathologic parameters alone and is easy to use in a c
linical setting.
CONCLUSIONS. On the basis of these data and previous reports, high Ki-67 pr
oliferative index is suggested as a significant factor for predicting the p
rognosis of patients with high-risk STS and should be evaluated prospective
ly based on clinical trials. (C) 2001 American Cancer Society.