The purpose of this study was to evaluate the construct validity of the Con
tinuous Attention Test for Children (the CAT), a clinical measure of vigila
nce. To examine convergent and discriminant validity, a multitrait-multimet
hod matrix was used. It was predicted that the CAT would correlate with oth
er neuropsychological measures involving vigilance, but not with measures i
nvolving potential confounds (e.g., short-term memory). Participants were 4
7 children, aged 6 to 11, referred for neuropsychological assessment. Resul
ts partially supported discriminant validity, but convergent validity was w
eak. That is, findings suggest that the CAT measures an ability distinct fr
om those assessed by some other popular tests involving vigilance. However,
method-related confounds may remain. The CAT appears to add useful informa
tion in the context of clinical evaluations.