The use of dilute Calogen((R)) as a fat density oral contrast medium in upper abdominal computed tomography, compared with the use of water and positive oral contrast media
Dw. Ramsay et al., The use of dilute Calogen((R)) as a fat density oral contrast medium in upper abdominal computed tomography, compared with the use of water and positive oral contrast media, CLIN RADIOL, 56(8), 2001, pp. 670-673
AIM: Oral contrast media are commonly given prior to computed tomography (C
T) examination of the upper abdomen. Although positive oral contrast media
are normally used, there is increasing interest in using negative agents su
ch as water and less commonly fat density products. The aim of this study w
as to compare a positive oral contrast medium, water, and a diluted emulsio
n of arachis oil (Calogen (R), a fat density food supplement) for assessmen
t of the upper abdomen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients referred for upper abdominal CT
were randomized to receive either 500 ml water, 2% sodium diatrizoate or a
dilute suspension of Calogen (R). The CT images were scored independently
by three radiologists. Distension and anatomical identification was assesse
d for the stomach, duodenum and jejunum, with anatomical identification rec
orded for the pancreas, retroperitoneum, liver, gallbladder and spleen.
RESULTS: Dilute Calogen (R) produced a significant improvement (P < 0.01) i
n distension and anatomical visualization of the stomach and proximal duode
num. Only minimal differences were demonstrated between the three contrast
media for visualization of more distal small bowel or identification of the
other upper abdominal viscera. Significantly more artifacts were caused by
positive contrast media than with the Calogen (R) mixture.
CONCLUSION: A dilute suspension of Calogen (R) as an oral contrast medium i
s recommended when disease is suspected within the stomach or proximal duod
enum. (C) 2001 The Royal College of Radiologists.