Comparison of epinephrine with vasopressin on bone marrow blood flow in ananimal model of hypovolemic shock and subsequent cardiac arrest

Objective: The intraosseous route is an emergency alternative for the admin istration of drugs and fluids if vascular access cannot be established. How ever, in hemorrhagic shock or after vasopressors are given during resuscita tion, bone marrow blood flow may be decreased, thus impairing absorption of intraosseously administered drugs. In this study, we evaluated the effects of vasopressin vs. high-dose epinephrine in hemorrhagic shock and cardiac arrest on bone marrow blood flow. Design: Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation that used an estab lished porcine model for measurement of hemodynamic variables and organ blo od flow. Setting: University hospital laboratory. Subjects. Fourteen pigs weighing 30 +/- 3 kg. Interventions: Radiolabeled microspheres were injected to measure bone marr ow blood flow during a prearrest control period and during hypovolemic shoc k produced by rapid hemorrhage of 35% of the estimated blood volume. In the second part of the study, ventricular fibrillation was induced; after 4 mi ns of untreated cardiac arrest and 4 mins of standard cardiopulmonary resus citation, a bolus dose of either 200 mug/kg epinephrine (n = 6) or 0.8 unit s/kg vasopressin (n = 6) was administered. Defibrillation was attempted 2.5 mins after drug administration, and blood flow was assessed again at 5 and 30 mins after successful resuscitation. Measurements and Main Results: Mean +/- SEM bone marrow blood flow decrease d significantly during induction of hemorrhagic shock from 14.4 +/- 4.1 to 3.7 +/- 1.8 mL.100 g(-1)-min(-1) in the vasopressin group and from 18.2 +/- 4.0 to 5.2 +/- 1.0 mL.100 g(-1).min(-1) in the epinephrine group (p = .025 in both groups). Five minutes after return of spontaneous circulation, mea n +/- SEM bone marrow blood flow was 3.4 +/- 1.1 mL.100 g(-1).min(-1) after vasopressin and 0.1 +/- 0.03 mL.100 g(-1).min(-1) after epinephrine (p = . 004 for vasopressin vs. epinephrine). At the same time, bone vascular resis tance was significantly (p = .004) higher in the epinephrine group when com pared with vasopressin (1455 +/- 392 vs. 43 +/- 19 mm Hg.mL(-1).100 g.min, respectively). Conclusions., Bone blood flow responds actively to both the physiologic str ess response of hemorrhagic shock and vasopressors given during resuscitati on after hypovolemic cardiac arrest. In this regard, bone marrow blood flow after successful resus-citation was nearly absent after high-dose epinephr ine but was maintained after high-dose vasopressin. These findings emphasiz e the need for pressurized intraosseous infusion techniques, because bone m arrow blood flow may not be predictable during hemorrhagic shock and drug t herapy.