Drawing on an ethnographic account of toxic waste protest in post-reunifica
tion Germany, the article compares three models of environmental activism (
by Douglas and Wildavsky, Melucci and Latour respectively) which problemati
ze the production of knowledge. Insights from social studies of science are
used to examine the entanglement of language and matter in environmentalis
m. The article suggests, however, that unless scholars pay due attention to
the way they frame their questions, they are at risk of finding their work
irrelevant or impotent. On the other hand, it suggests that to achieve rel
evance and power, empirical, particularly ethnographic accounts, which emer
ge out of a meeting between activism an academia, are also required.