Mp. Feeney et Dh. Keefe, Estimating the acoustic reflex threshold from wideband measures of reflectance, admittance, and power, EAR HEAR, 22(4), 2001, pp. 316-332
Objective. A method was developed to estimate the contralateral acoustic re
flex threshold using shifts in wideband energy reflectance, admittance magn
itude and power.
Design: In the first experiment contralateral reflex thresholds for a noise
activator were estimated on three adult participants using reflectance, ad
mittance and power measurements at frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz. The ref
lex threshold was defined using a magnitude and a correlation technique, bo
th having the property of examining the pattern of the reflex-induced shift
across a fairly broad frequency range (250 to 2000 Hz). In the second expe
riment, the magnitude method was modified to include an F test for the comp
arison of the magnitude of reflex-induced shifts in reflectance, admittance
and power relative to response differences in a no-activator baseline cond
ition. Data from four additional participants then were analyzed across a b
roader frequency range using a method that combined magnitude and correlati
on methods of estimating reflex thresholds.
Results. Acoustic reflex thresholds were obtained using reflectance, admitt
ance and power-level measures in all subjects in both experiments. Individu
al reflex threshold estimates were as much as 24 dB lower than with the cli
nical system, with an average of approximately 14 dB lower for the three pa
rticipants in the first experiment, and approximately 18 dB lower for the f
our participants in the second experiment.
Conclusions. Wideband measures of reflectance, admittance and power were su
ccessfully used to estimate acoustic reflex thresholds in seven participant
s. A reflex threshold test was devised based on the magnitude of the respon
se shift in the presence of a contralateral activator, and the similarity o
f the response shift spectra across frequency between successive activator
levels. Across all participants in the study, the new test yielded a more s
ensitive measure of the acoustic reflex threshold than the clinical method.
This finding has both clinical and theoretical implications for the study
of the acoustic reflex.