R. Richard et al., Non-invasive cardiac output evaluation during a maximal progressive exercise test, using a new impedance cardiograph device, EUR J A PHY, 85(3-4), 2001, pp. 202-207
One of the greatest challenges in exercise physiology is to develop a valid
, reliable, non-invasive and affordable measurement of cardiac output (CO).
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy
of a new impedance cardiograph device, the Physio Flow, during a 1-min ste
p incremental exercise test from rest to maximal peak effort. A group of 12
subjects was evaluated to determine the reproducibility of the method as f
ollows: (1) each subject performed two comparable tests while their CO was
measured by impedance cardiography using the new device (COImp1, COImp2), a
nd (2) in a subgroup of 7 subjects CO was also determined by the direct Fic
k method (COFick) during the second test. The mean difference between the v
alues obtained by impedance (i.e. COImp1-COImp2) was -0.009 1.min(-1) (95%
confidence interval: -4.2 1.min(-1), 4.2 1.min(-1)), and CO ranged from 3.5
5 1.min(-1) to 26.75 1.min(-1) (n=146). When expressed as a percentage, the
difference (COImp1-COImp2) did not vary with increasing CO. The correlatio
n coefficient between the values of COImp and COFick obtained during the se
cond exercise test was r=0.94 (P<0.01, n=50). The mean difference expressed
as percentage was -2.78% (95% confidence interval: -27.44%, 21.78%). We co
nclude that COImp provides a clinically acceptable evaluation of CO in heal
thy subjects during an incremental exercise.