This article is concerned with problems of comparative research and analysi
s in industrial relations, and in particular with cross-national comparison
of trade unions. Comparison is of both practical and theoretical importanc
e, but is fraught with difficulties, in part because of the paradox involve
d in attempting to generalize concerning national instances which are in so
many respects unique. The author considers three different approaches to a
nalysis, in terms respectively of institutions, functions and issues. In co
nclusion, the article emphasizes the iterative nature of research and analy
sis and insists that even if the goal of satisfactory cross-national compar
ison may be unattainable, its pursuit is both necessary and valuable.