Loss of heel pad elasticity has been suggested as one of the possible expla
nations of heel pain. This study aimed to determine the effect of heel pad
thickness and its compressibility to heel pressure distribution, in 47 (94
feet) normal subjects and 59 (94 feet) patients with heel pain, using radio
logical measurements and EMED-SF (Novel, Munich) plantar pressure distribut
ion measurement system.
Both heels of the patients and control group were radiographed with and wit
hout weight bearing. The ratio of the heel pad thickness in loading to unlo
ading position was defined as "the heel pad compressibility index." The pla
ntar peak pressure of the heel was measured at heel strike phase of the gai
t cycle.
The compressibility index for control and patient groups were found to be 0
.60 and 0.69, respectively. The peak pressure under the heel pad was record
ed to be 28.4 N/cm2 for patients and 31.7 N/cm(2) for control group. No sig
nificant difference was found for heel pad compressibility index and heel p
ad pressures between patient and control groups (p > 0.05).
This study revealed that there is no relationship between heel pad compress
ibility and pressure distribution of the heel pad both in control and patie
nt group. We feel the flexibility of the heel pad does not have any influen
ce on heel pain syndromes.