Lime treatment and its effects on the chemistry and biota of hardwater eutrophic lakes

Citation
Ee. Prepas et al., Lime treatment and its effects on the chemistry and biota of hardwater eutrophic lakes, FRESHW BIOL, 46(8), 2001, pp. 1049-1060
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00465070 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1049 - 1060
Database
ISI
SICI code
0046-5070(200108)46:8<1049:LTAIEO>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
1. The main focus of this study was to investigate the effects of single an d multiple moderate doses of lime (slaked lime, Ca(OH)(2), and/or calcite, CaCO3) on eutrophic hardwater lakes. This information would contribute to s trategies to manage phytoplankton and macrophyte biomass in eutrophic lakes . 2. Water chemistry and biota were monitored for up to 7 years after initial lime treatment and results were compared with reference systems. 3. Complementary studies investigated the effect of lime on macrophytes in ponds, irrigation canals and microcosm experiments. 4. When water pH was kept within its natural range (less than or equal to 1 0), single and multiple lime applications to lakes and ponds controlled mac rophyte biomass, without negatively affecting invertebrate communities. 5. Single lime treatments at moderate dosages of lakes and ponds resulted i n variable and mostly temporary changes in chlorophyll a (chl a) and phosph orus (P) concentration. Although sediment P release was reduced in single-d ose lakes during the first winter following treatment, reductions appeared temporary. 6. Multiple treatments of lakes and ponds were effective at reducing both c hl a and P concentrations over longer periods. Mean winter P release rate w as also reduced after initial treatment. 7. In laboratory studies, sediment cores were incubated with eight differen t treatments to assess P release. Redox-sensitive treatments were no more e ffective at lowering total P concentration in overlying water than some red ox-insensitive treatments. Lime reduced total P concentrations, but was not as effective as treatments with alum. 8. The use of lime in managing macrophyte and phytoplankton biomass in shal low, hardwater lakes and ponds may be preferable over other treatments, bec ause lime is economical and non-toxic as long as pH is kept within a natura l range.