The surface fractal dimension of the soil-pore interface as measured by image analysis

There is general interest in quantifying soil structure in order to obtain physically based parameters relevant to transport processes. To measure the surface fractal dimension of the pore-solid interface we use approaches kn own from fractal geometry. The characteristics of this interface, expressed by its fractal dimension, are descriptors of the heterogeneity and complex ity of soil structure. Samples of the Bt horizon of a Luvisol in loess were taken near Gottingen, Germany. To prepare thin sections, the material was dehydrated and embedded in resin. We obtained digital images at different m agnifications from a field emission scanning electron microscope. Automatic image analysis was used to determine the corresponding surface fractal dim ension by using the box counting and dilation methods, respectively. As the fractal dimension of a line (D-L) within a plain has been measured, the su rface fractal dimension D-S is obtained by D-S = D-L + 1 assuming isotropy. We strongly focussed the calculation of the fractal dimension from the mea sured data files. The decision as to which data should be included between the lower and upper cutoffs is of fundamental significance to the final res ult. For the upper cutoff, we followed the convention that the scale range should not exceed 30% of the characteristic length (object or image size). Data derived from outside both cutoffs reflect structural proper-ties, eith er of pixels (lower cutoff) or of structuring elements (upper cutoff). Diff erent methods were used to derive a mean surface fractal dimension for one magnification for (i) single images and (ii) each measurement step. Within the same range of scale, differences between the two methods (box counting and dilation) were smaller than the standard deviation of D-S. In contrast to our expectations for a mathematical fractal, we found decreasing values for D-S with increasing magnification. The values drift from D-S = 2.91 for a resolution of 2.44 mum/pixel to D-S = 2.58 for a resolution of 0.05 mum/ pixel. By fitting two straight lines to the log-log plot, we found a crosso ver-point at a scale of about 14 mum, forming the border between textural a nd structural fractality. In addition, we will discuss further results obta ined as well as possible sources of error. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. A ll rights reserved.