It is widely assumed that after 1918 the British general staff ignored the
experience it had gained from fighting a first-class European enemy and tha
t it was not until the establishment of the Kirke committee in 1932 that it
began to garner the lessons of the Great War and incorporate them into its
doctrine. This article demonstrates that in fact British military doctrine
underwent a continuous process of development in the 1920s. Far from turni
ng its back on new military technologies, the general staff rejected the ma
npower-intensive doctrine that had sustained the army in 1914 in favour of
one that placed modernity and machinery at the very core of its thinking. B
etween 1919 and 1931 the general staff did assimilate the lessons of the Fi
rst World War into the army's written doctrine. But what it failed to do wa
s to impose a common understanding of the meaning of that doctrine througho
ut the army.