Eh. Serne et al., Impaired skin capillary recruitment in essential hypertension is caused byboth functional and structural capillary rarefaction, HYPERTENSIO, 38(2), 2001, pp. 238-242
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Capillary rarefaction occurs in many tissues in patients with essential hyp
ertension and may contribute to an increased vascular resistance and impair
ed muscle metabolism. Rarefaction may be caused by a structural (anatomic)
absence of capillaries, functional nonperfusion, or both. The aim of this s
tudy was to assess the extent of structural versus functional capillary rar
efaction in the skin of subjects with essential hypertension. We examined s
kin capillary density with video microscopy before and during maximization
of the number or perfused capillaries by venous congestion (structural capi
llary number) and before and during postocclusive reactive hyperemia (capil
lary recruitment, which may have a structural and/or functional basis). The
study group was composed or 26 patients with never-treated essential hyper
tension and 26 normotensive control subjects. In both groups, intermittentl
y perfused capillaries in the resting state were an important functional re
serve for recruitment during postocclusive hyperemia. Recruitment of perfus
ed capillaries during postocclusive reactive hyperemia was decreased in the
hypertensive subjects compared with normotensive control subjects (47.9 +/
-6.8 versus 55.3 +/-8.2 capillaries/mm(2), respectively; P<0.01). During ve
nous occlusion, maximal capillary density was significantly lower in the hy
pertensive subjects than in the control subjects (52.5<plus/minus>6.6 versu
s 57.2 +/-8.6 capillaries/mm(2), respectively; P<0.05), suggesting structur
al rarefaction. However, in the hypertensive subjects compared with the nor
motensive subjects, a smaller proportion of the maximal number of capillari
es was perfused during postocclusive hyperemia (91.6<plus/minus>7.5% versus
97.2 +/-2.7%, respectively; P<0.05), suggesting an additional functional i
mpairment of capillary recruitment. If the difference in capillary numbers
during venous congestion (<approximate to>4.6 capillaries/mm(2)) truly refl
ects the structural difference between the normotensive and hypertensive su
bjects, then, at most, 62% (4.6/7.4X100%) of the difference in capillary nu
mbers during postocclusive hyperemia (approximate to7.4 capillaries/mm(2))
can be explained by structural defects, and at least 38% can be explained b
y functional defects. In conclusion, in patients with essential hypertensio
n, recruitment of perfused capillaries is impaired, which can be explained
by both functional and structural rarefaction.