This essay looks at the patterns of pawning in Germany in the decades prece
ding the First World War. It tries to present pawning and thus also the eco
nomy of nineteenth-century working-class households in a new light. Contrar
y to the generally accepted view of social historians, it is unlikely that
pawning served to secure the proletarian household in periods of real hards
hip. There is much evidence that pawning was only considered when it seemed
very likely that the borrower would be able to redeem the pledge in due co
urse. It was therefore part of a rather stable economic situation. Insecuri
ty of prospects persuaded people to refrain from pawning. Pawnshops thrived
not on working-class destitution, but on the very modest "affluence" prole
tarian families were able to achieve in the era of industrialization. The s
triking differences between the patterns of pawning in Germany and in Great
Britain therefore point to significant differences in proletarian standard
s of living between the two societies in question.