This paper uses a differential game model to study the basic nature of the
international competition between the technological leaders and latecomers.
The monopolistic firms in the two types of countries engage R&D activities
to produce similar products and export them in the world market. The firm
in Country I (technological advanced) engages in both basic and applied res
earch, whereas the firm in Country Il imports basic technology from Country
I and makes improvements to it.
It is shown that the final outcome depends on the strategies of each firm.
Because of the asymmetric nature of the two firms in R&D activities, the fi
rm with a more efficient applied technology may not necessarily win the com
petition - "paradox." This paper examines the various conditions under whic
h these paradoxical cases may emerge. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All ri
ghts reserved.