Background: Latex causes anaphylaxis in specific contexts among children. W
e present 2 cases that show that severe reactions may occur in everyday cir
cumstances with latex as a contaminant.
Objective: Because 2 cases of severe reactions to latex suggested similar c
ircumstances of exposure, we investigated the immediate environment in whic
h episodes occurred.
Methods. A 5-year-old girt presented to our casualty department with anaphy
laxis after playing in a ball pit filled with approximately 10-cm diameter
plastic balls in an American-style fast-food outlet. Two months later, a 9-
year-old boy had severe anaphylaxis followed by an asthma attack with loss
of consciousness while playing in the playpen of a different outlet belongi
ng to the same company. Latex sensitization was confirmed in both cases by
means of skin prick testing, latex glove skin prick testing, and 1-glove fi
nger testing. Immunoblotting of elutions from a ball, the natural rubber la
tex foam pit lining and its polyvinyl chloride sheet were performed.
Results: In the girl's immunoblot high levels of IgE specific to Hey b 4, H
ev b 7, and Hev b 2 were found. The boy's immunoblot showed positivity to R
ev b 7. The polyvinyl chloride ball sample showed a high concentration of s
pecific Hevea species allergen similar to that of the foam layer sample.
Conclusion. Severe anaphylaxis can result from contact with latex proteins
as a contaminant, rather than as a component, of play area ball pits and th
erefore outside the reported settings. Emergency health care workers should
be aware of this kind of risk. A latex-reduced environment might prevent p
otentially severe reactions in young customers of fast-food outlets.