Differences in the capture rate of cage-trapped red foxes Vulpes vulpes and an evaluation of rabies control measures in Britain

Citation
Pj. Baker et al., Differences in the capture rate of cage-trapped red foxes Vulpes vulpes and an evaluation of rabies control measures in Britain, J APPL ECOL, 38(4), 2001, pp. 823-835
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00218901 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
823 - 835
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8901(200108)38:4<823:DITCRO>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
1. Methods used to control canids may differ in their relative effectivenes s and how they 'sample' age and sex classes. However, there is little infor mation on such biases. We utilized data from a population of known size and structure to quantify differences in the seasonal capture rate of foxes Vu lpes vulpes of different age, sex and social status. The effects of home-ra nge utilization and trap experience were also investigated. 2. The capture rate of juvenile (< 1 years) foxes was highest in spring and declined throughout the year. Adult (<greater than or equal to> 1 years) t rap rates were equivalent to those of juveniles in winter. 3. Neither juveniles nor adults exhibited sex differences in trappability. 4. Adults were classified as dominant or subordinate based upon patterns of dyadic interaction. Subordinate foxes were trapped more frequently than do minants. 5. Trappability did not differ inside or outside of core areas, after contr olling for trap effort. 6. Previous trap experience did not affect the capture rate of adult foxes. 7. Captures of non-resident foxes peaked in winter (52% of captures), assoc iated with dispersing juveniles and adult males, and were lowest in summer (13%). 8. In Britain, 75-90% of foxes would need to consume poison or vaccine bait s to control a rabies epizooty. During simulated rabies control operations, where cage-trapping was used to measure the proportion of foxes taking dum my baits containing a biomarker, < 30% of foxes consumed baits. However, no n-resident foxes present during the period of baiting but not during trappi ng, or vice versa, may bias these calculations. We used the frequency of ca pture of non-resident foxes to re-examine the success rate of these trials. 9. Revised estimates still suggest that < 45% of foxes were reached during the simulated control operations. This is significantly below the levels ne cessary for rabies control. Further biomarker trials are required that do n ot rely only on trapping for sample collection and where the residency stat us of captured foxes has been determined.