Hm. Macdonald et al., COL1A1 Sp1 polymorphism predicts perimenopausal and early postmenopausal spinal bone loss, J BONE MIN, 16(9), 2001, pp. 1634-1641
Genetic factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis
but the genes that determine susceptibility to poor bone health are defined
incompletely. Previous work has shown that a polymorphism that affects an
Sp1 binding site in the COL1A1 gene is associated with reduced bone mineral
density (BMD) and an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture in several po
pulations. Data from cross-sectional studies have indicated that COL1A1 Sp1
alleles also may be associated with increased rates of bone loss with age,
but longitudinal studies, which have examined bone loss in relation to COL
1A1 genotype, have yielded conflicting results. In this study, we examined
the relationship between COL1A1 Sp1 alleles and early postmenopausal bone l
oss measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a population-base
d cohort of 734 Scottish women who were followed up over a 5- to 7-year per
iod. The distribution of genotypes was as expected in a white population wi
th 484 "SS" homozygotes (65.9%); 225 "Ss" heterozygotes (30.7%), and 25 "ss
" homozygotes (3.4%). Women taking hormone-replacement therapy (HRT, n = 23
9) had considerably reduced rates of bone loss at the spine (-0.40 +/- 0.06
%/year) and hip (-0.56 +/- 0.06%/year) when compared with non-HRT users (n
= 352; spine, -1.36 +/- 0.06%/year; hip, -1.21 +/- 0.05%/year, p < 0.001 fo
r both sites). There was no significant difference in baseline BMD values a
t the lumbar spine (LS) or femoral neck TM between genotypes or in the rate
s of bone loss between genotypes in HRT users. However, in non-HRT users (n
= 352), we found that ss homozygotes (n = 12) lost significantly more bone
at the lumbar site than the other genotype groups in which ss = -2.26 +/-
0.31%/year compared with SS = -1.38 +/- 0.07%/year and Ss = -1.22 +/- 0.10%
/year (p = 0.004; analysis of variance [ANOVA]) and a similar trend was obs
erved at the FN in which ss = -1.78 +/- 0.19%/year compared with SS = -1.21
+/- 0.06%/year and Ss = -1.16 +/- 0.08%/year (p = 0.06; ANOVA). The differ
ences in spine BMD loss remained significant after correcting for confoundi
ng factors. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that COL1A1 genoty
pe independently accounted for a further 3.0% of the variation in spine BMD
change after age (4.0%), weight (5.0%), and baseline BMD (2.8%). We conclu
de that women homozygous for the Sp1 polymorphism are at significantly incr
eased risk of excess rates of bone loss at the spine, but this effect may b
e nullified by the use of HRT.