A functional comparison of mutations in integrin beta cytoplasmic domains:effects on the regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation, cell spreading, cell attachment and beta 1 integrin conformation
Al. Bodeau et al., A functional comparison of mutations in integrin beta cytoplasmic domains:effects on the regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation, cell spreading, cell attachment and beta 1 integrin conformation, J CELL SCI, 114(15), 2001, pp. 2795-2807
Cell adhesion is a multistep process that requires the interaction of integ
rins with their ligands in cell attachment, the activation of integrin-trig
gered signals, and cell spreading. Integrin beta subunit cytoplasmic domain
s (beta tails) participate in regulating each of these steps; however, it i
s not known whether the same or different regions within beta tails are req
uired. We generated a panel of amino acid substitutions within the beta1 an
d beta3 cytoplasmic domains to determine whether distinct regions within be
ta tails regulate different steps in adhesion. We expressed these beta cyto
plasmic domains in the context of interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor (tac) chime
ras and tested their ability to activate tyrosine phosphorylation, to regul
ate beta1 integrin conformation and to inhibit PI integrin function in cell
attachment and spreading. We found that many of the mutant beta1 and beta3
chimeras either had no effect on these parameters or dramatically inhibite
d the function of the beta tail in most assays. However, one set of analogo
us Ala substitutions in the beta1 and beta3 tails differentially affected t
he ability of the tac-beta1 and tac-0 beta3 chimeras to activate tyrosine p
hosphorylation. The tac-beta1 mutant containing Ala substitutions for the V
TT motif did not signal, whereas the analogous tac-beta3 mutant was able to
activate tyrosine phosphorylation, albeit not to wild-type levels. We also
identified a few mutations that inhibited beta tail function in only a sub
set of assays. Ala substitutions for the Val residue in the VTT motif of th
e beta1 tail or for the conserved Asp and Glu residues in the membrane-prox
imal region of the beta3 tail greatly diminished the ability of tac-beta1 a
nd tac-beta3 to inhibit cell spreading, but had minimal effects in other as
says. Ala substitutions for the Trp and Asp residues in the conserved WDT m
otif in the beta1 tail had dramatic effects on the ability of tac-beta1 to
regulate integrin conformation and function in cell spreading, but had no o
r intermediate effects in other assays. The identification of mutations in
the beta1 and beta3 tails that specifically abrogated the ability of these
beta tails to regulate beta1 integrin conformation and function in cell spr
eading suggests that distinct protein interactions with beta tails regulate
beta cytoplasmic domain function in these processes.