Systemic and local antimicrobial use in periodontal therapy in England andWales

Citation
M. Choudhury et al., Systemic and local antimicrobial use in periodontal therapy in England andWales, J CLIN PER, 28(9), 2001, pp. 833-839
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
ISSN journal
03036979 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
833 - 839
Database
ISI
SICI code
0303-6979(200109)28:9<833:SALAUI>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Background/aims: The aim of this study was to investigate antimicrobial use during periodontal therapy in dental practice in England & Wales. Method: This was a postal questionnaire survey of 800 dentists, 400 general dental practitioners (GDP) in National Health Service practice and 400 mem bers of the British Society of Periodontology (Periodontal Society) primari ly in dental practice. We designed and piloted a questionnaire to evaluate both systemic and local antibiotic use with periodontal therapy as well as factors affecting their prescription. In addition, we also investigated the potential use of antibiotic sensitivity testing, since this has been recom mended prior to prescribing antibiotics. Two follow-up mailings were used t o encourage non-responders. Results: The useable return rate for the questionnaires was 587/800 (73%). Systemic antibiotics were used by 7.4% Periodontal Society members and 18.4 % GDP for untreated adult periodontitis patients (p <0.001). Antimicrobials were prescribed more frequently by Periodontal Society members in early on set (52.7%) and refractory periodontitis patients (49.6%), and this was hig hly statistically significantly greater usage than GDP (p <0.001). Regardin g local antimicrobials, usage for untreated adult periodontitis was Periodo ntal Society 8.9% and GDP 5.4%. Higher usage of local antimicrobials was fo und both for the treatment of recurrent pocketing in adult periodontitis (P eriodontal Society 26.3%, GDP 14.8%, p <0.014) and refractory periodontitis (Periodontal Society 30.8%, GDP 15.2%, p <0.001). As reasons for using loc al antimicrobials, more than 80% of all respondents stated superiority over root debridement alone. Barriers to use included cost, no perceived need a nd lack of supporting research data. The percentage of responders consideri ng diagnostic microbiology either theoretically or at a cost of pound 60 we re by group, Periodontal Society 83% & 70.4% and GDP 76% & 51.2%. 33% of Pe riodontal Society members and 3.8% of GDP spent at least 45 min per quadran t on root planing and Periodontal Society members had a greater exposure to lectures on both systemic and local drug therapy compared with GDP (p <0.0 01). Conclusions: Systemic antimicrobial use was infrequent for adult periodonti tis and generally in line with current recommendations for other disease ty pes. Whilst local antimicrobial therapy for periodontitis was not widesprea d, a substantial minority of dentists use this form of therapy and most bel ieve that it is more effective than root debridement alone.