Clinical outcome of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. A follow-up study of 588 consecutive patients

Citation
Sh. Poulsen et al., Clinical outcome of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. A follow-up study of 588 consecutive patients, J INTERN M, 250(2), 2001, pp. 137-143
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09546820 → ACNP
Volume
250
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
137 - 143
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-6820(200108)250:2<137:COOPWS>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Objective. To investigate the clinical outcome in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Design and setting. In a retrospective design we studied 588 consecutive pa tients with suspected PE and referred for lung scintigraphy from 1995 to 19 98. The mean follow-up time was 653 +/- 424 days. Results. The diagnosis of PE was confirmed in 194 and excluded in 394 patie nts, respectively. The overall prevalence of PE was 33%. Amongst clinical a nd paraclinical variables, age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD ), heart rate, pleuretic pain, presence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), el ectrocardiographic signs of right ventricular (RV) strain were identified a s independent predictors of the diagnosis of PE. Amongst patients with PE a nticoagulation was given in 96% for at least 3 months and 13% received thro mbolytic therapy. Recurrent PE was seen in 6% of patients with PE whereas n one of the patients with no diagnosis of PE suffered PE during follow-up. T he 1 year mortality was 18% amongst patients with PE and 15% in patients wi th excluded PE (P = NS). The cause of death amongst patients with PE was ca ncer (49%) and PE (28%), whereas patients without PE had an excess mortalit y because of cancer, COPD, acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. Conclusion. Patients admitted to hospital on suspicion of PE have increased risk of adverse clinical outcome whether the diagnosis of PE is confirmed or not. This indicates that the patients where the diagnosis is excluded of ten suffer from other serious illness that warrants further investigations.