Despite remarkable advances in cardiovascular therapeutics, sudden car
diac death remains a significant problem. In this review, data from cl
inical trials and other studies on antiarrhythmic therapies have been
evaluated in order to determine effective strategies for the preventio
n of sudden cardiac death in high risk patients. Overall, routine prop
hylactic use of class I antiarrhythmic agents in high risk patients, m
ostly survivors of acute myocardial infarction, is associated with inc
reased risk of death [61 trials, 23 486 patients: odds ratio (OR) 1.13
; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.27, p < 0.05]. Conversely, be
ta-blockers are associated with highly significant reductions in risk
of death in postinfarction patients (56 trials, 53 521 patients: OR 0.
81; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.87, p < 0.00001). Overall data from the amiodaron
e trials on high risk patients, including postinfarction patients, pat
ients with congestive heart failure or survivors of cardiac arrest, su
ggest that this agent is effective in reducing the risk of death (14 t
rials, 5713 patients: OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.95, p = 0.01) although
further studies are needed to better define which types of patients w
ill potentially benefit most from this agent. No benefits were seen wi
th calcium channel blockers (26 trials, 21 644 patients: OR 1.03; 95%
CI 0.94 to 1.13, p = NS).The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is
a promising option for high risk patients, but definition of its role
awaits the completion of ongoing clinical trials. Since causes of sud
den death are heterogeneous, the clinician should pursue a multifactor
ial approach to its prevention. Primary and secondary prevention of ca
rdiac ischaemia, through the treatment of cardiovascular risk factors
and maximising the use of aspirin, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering drugs
, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors after acute myocardial
infarction, should lead to a future decrease in the incidence of sudde
n cardiac death.