Prospective randomized comparison between a dynamic hip screw and a mini-invasive static nail in fractures of the trochanteric area: Preliminary results
Fh. Dujardin et al., Prospective randomized comparison between a dynamic hip screw and a mini-invasive static nail in fractures of the trochanteric area: Preliminary results, J ORTHOP TR, 15(6), 2001, pp. 401-406
Objectives: This study aimed at comparing the results obtained with a slidi
ng screw plate and an experimental device including a small-diameter nail t
hat can be placed with a mini-invasive approach and provides a stable fixat
ion.
Design: Randomized prospective study.
Setting: University hospital.
Patients: The study included two groups with thirty fractures of the trocha
nteric area.
Interventions: In both groups, the surgical procedure was carried out on pa
tients placed on a traction table in a supine position, under an x-ray ampl
ifier. Sliding screw plates (THS) were set in place according to the usual
open technique. Nails were placed through a twenty-millimeter supratrochant
eric cutaneous incision. This experimental system comprised a locked intram
edullary nail with two nonparallel seven-millimeter cervicocephalic screws.
Main Outcome Measures: The comparison between the two groups was based on t
he surgical procedure (time, duration of x-ray irradiation, and total blood
loss); the initial postoperative period (complications, duration of hospit
al stay, and the time before returning home); the time before full weight b
earing became effective; the functional and social recovery; mortality; and
the quality of immediate and final anatomic restitution and healing.
Results: Operating time (p < 0.001) and blood loss (p < 0.001) were lower i
n the nail group, and no blood transfusion was required. Postoperative pain
(p < 0.01), time necessary to support full weight bearing (p < 0.02), and
time before returning home (p < 0.05) were reduced in the nail group. All f
ractures healed in the same amount of time, with good anatomic results in t
he nail group, whereas ten impactions beyond ten millimeters occurred in th
e plate group. No difference was found between the two groups in walking ab
ility and autonomy recovery, but hip function (p < 0.05) was better in the
nail group.
Conclusion: This preliminary clinical study has shown the advantages of thi
s mini-invasive technique. It could not evaluate all the possible disadvant
ages inherent in the method. These points will be evaluated in a multicente
r study justified by these preliminary results.