D. Hamelberg et al., Influence of the dynamic positions of cations on the structure of the DNA minor groove: Sequence-dependent effects, J AM CHEM S, 123(32), 2001, pp. 7745-7755
Different models for minor groove structures predict that the conformation
is essentially fixed by sequence and has an influence on local ion distribu
tion or alternatively that temporal positions of ions around the minor groo
ve can affect the structure if they neutralize cross-strand phosphate charg
es. Our previous studies show that the minor groove in an AATT dodecamer re
sponds to local sodium ion positions and is narrow when ions neutralize cro
ss-strand phosphate-phosphate charges [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10513-1
0520]. Previous results from a number of laboratories have shown that G-tra
cts often have a wider minor groove than A-tracts, but they do not indicate
whether this is due to reduced flexibility or differences in ion interacti
ons. We have undertaken a molecular dynamics study of a d(TATAGGCCTATA) dup
lex to answer this question. The results show that the G-tract has the same
amplitude of minor groove fluctuations as the A-tract sequence but that it
has fewer ion interactions that neutralize cross-strand phosphate charges.
These results demonstrate that differences in time-average groove width be
tween A- and G-tracts are due to differences in ion interactions at the min
or groove. When ions neutralize the cross-strand phosphates, the minor groo
ve is narrow. When there are no neutralizing ion interactions, the minor gr
oove is wide. The population of structures with no ion interactions is larg
er with the GGCC than with the AATT duplex, and GGCC has a wider time-avera
ge minor groove in agreement with experiment.