This paper compares aeroacoustic methods for the prediction of parallel bla
de-vortex interaction noise using data from a specialized rotor test. The t
est, performed in the NASA Ames 80- by 120-Foot Wind Tunnel, involved a sma
ll-scale rotor interacting with a vortex generated by a wing mounted upstre
am. These data were the focus of a working group that compared a wide range
of methods for the prediction of BVI noise. The aerodynamic models include
computational fluid dynamics, boundary element, and indicial methods. Acou
stic methods include Kirchhoff methods and the Ffowes-Williams Hawkings app
roach. The comparisons of computed and measured surface pressure data revea
l a number of differences, none of which seem to have major acoustic signif
icance. Comparisons of computed and measured far-field pressures show that
BVI acoustics is generally well predicted when the blade aerodynamics are w
ell defined, with more variations being found between the Kirchhoff methods
. Within the limitations of the present test, this indicates that BVI noise
is reasonably well predicted when vortex parameters (location, circulation
, and core radius) are accurately known.