All seismic data contain a mixture of signal and noise. In detailed reservo
ir characterisation, it is commonly difficult to distinguish between real f
eatures and seismic artefacts. This is especially a problem when interpreti
ng seismic attribute maps. Such maps are widely used tools during reservoir
description, but serious pitfalls exist, which may lead to erroneous inter
pretations and fatal development plans for oil fields. A recent interpretat
ion of seismic attribute maps from a seismic survey collected across Gullve
ig, an oil field located in the northern North Sea, has been used to illust
rate how small faults can be recognised and mapped from such maps. We appli
ed available well data (including core data) and two seismic surveys from t
he same area, and present convincing evidence that the vast majority of lin
ear features seen on the seismic attribute maps are, in fact, seismic artef
acts and not faults. The data from Gullveig are furthermore supplemented by
observations from the nearby Gullfaks Field and discussions on the topic o
f seismic noise. We use these observations and discussions to stress the im
portance of using all available data to guide and quality control the struc
tural interpretation of attribute map features before utilising such interp
retations as input to reservoir modelling or well planning. (C) 2001 Elsevi
er Science Ltd. All rights reserved.