The numerical properties of two implementations of the a posteriori recursi
ve least squares algorithm, the direct and the indirect algorithms, are ana
lysed in order to qualify their numerical trustworthiness, Although both im
plementations include update recursions that have the potential for large r
elative errors, the manner in which they are propagated into the update rec
ursions tor the reflection coefficients is shown to differ. It is this diff
erence that allows for the direct implementation to be more numerically tru
stworthy with respect to the indirect implementation. Copyright (C) 2001 Jo
hn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.