OBJECTIVE: To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of visual inspection
using acetic acid as a primary screen for cervical intraepithelial neoplas
ia (CIN).
METHODS. Visual inspection was done on 1997 women aged 35-45 years in a scr
eening trial in rural China. Each women had colposcopy and at least five ce
rvical biopsies (directed biopsy of lesions, one biopsy at 2, 4, 8, or 10 o
'clock at the squamocolumnar junction in each normal quadrant, and an endoc
ervical curettage).
RESULTS: Forty-three women had biopsy-proven CIN II, 31 had CIN III, and 12
had invasive cancer. In two women only the endocervix was positive (one wi
th CIN II and one with CIN III). Visual inspection yielded normal results i
n 1445 women (72%), low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 525 (26%), high-
grade in 21 (1%), and cancer in six (0.3%). With abnormal visual inspection
defined as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, or worse, the sensitivity
for detecting biopsy proven CIN II or worse was 71% (61 of 86, 95% confiden
ce interval [CI] 60%, 80%); the specificity was 74% (1420 of 1911, 95% CI 7
2%, 76%); the sensitivity was 65% for smaller lesions (37 of 57, 95% CI 51%
, 77%), and 89% for larger lesions (24 of 27, 95% CI 71%, 98%) (P = .03).
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of visual inspection equaled or exceeded report
ed rates for conventional cervical cytology. Visual inspection and colposco
py have similar specificity profiles for CIN II and greater. The benefit of
an inexpensive point-of-care diagnosis and treatment algorithm will be a p
owerful incentive to pursue visual inspection for cervical cancer screening
in developing countries. (C) 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists.