Ketamine sedation for pediatric critical care procedures

Citation
Sm. Green et al., Ketamine sedation for pediatric critical care procedures, PEDIAT EMER, 17(4), 2001, pp. 244-248
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE
ISSN journal
07495161 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
244 - 248
Database
ISI
SICI code
0749-5161(200108)17:4<244:KSFPCC>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Objectives: To describe our experience using ketamine sedation to facilitat e pediatric critical care procedures, and to document the safety profile of ketamine in this setting. Design: Retrospective consecutive case series. Setting: Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary children's hospital. Patients: Children receiving ketamine for procedural sedation over a 5-year period. Interventions: We reviewed patient records to determine indication, dosing, adverse events, inadequate sedation, and recovery time for each sedation. Outcome Measures: Descriptive features of sedation including adverse events . Results: During the study period, children in our pediatric intensive care unit received ketamine at total of 442 times to facilitate a wide variety o f critical care procedures, most commonly central line placement, esophagog astroduodenoscopy, and wound debridement. Most study children had substanti al underlying illness (ASA a: 3 in 88%; ASA greater than or equal to 4 in 3 9%). Inadequate sedation was noted in only nine (2%) procedures. Adverse ef fects included transient laryngospasm (n = 9), transient partial airway obs truction (n = 5), apnea with bradycardia (n = 1), emesis during the procedu re (n = 2), emesis during recovery (n = 9), mild recovery agitation (n = 10 ), moderate-to-severe recovery agitation (n = 1), and excessive salivation (n = 4). There were no adverse outcomes attributable to ketamine. Conclusion: Pediatric intensivists skilled in ketamine administration can s afely and effectively administer this drug to facilitate critical care proc edures. Despite the ill nature of our patient sample, adverse effects were uncommon.