Properties of F+, F and F- electron centers and adsorptivity of atomic H on LiF and NaH isoelectronic crystals: an ab initio study

Citation
As. Shalabi et al., Properties of F+, F and F- electron centers and adsorptivity of atomic H on LiF and NaH isoelectronic crystals: an ab initio study, PHYSICA B, 304(1-4), 2001, pp. 444-455
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science
Journal title
PHYSICA B
ISSN journal
09214526 → ACNP
Volume
304
Issue
1-4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
444 - 455
Database
ISI
SICI code
0921-4526(200109)304:1-4<444:POFFAF>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
An attempt has been made to examine the bulk and surface properties of exci ton bands near F+, F and F- centers (alpha, beta and gamma bands), diffusio n of electron centers (F+, F and F-) and adsorptivity of atomic H over the defect free and defect containing surfaces of LiF and NaH isoelectronic cry stals using an ab initio embedded cluster model at the second order Moller- Plesset perturbation level. The LiF and NaH clusters were embedded in simul ated Coulomb fields that closely approximate the Madelung potentials of the host crystals. The isoelectronic LiF and NaH clusters in crystals were fou nd to exhibit distinct differences in the title properties. The defect free and F+ band gaps and exciton bands of LiF were significantly greater than those of NaH. The LiF crystal was more sensitive to the relaxation effects than NaH. The activation energy barriers to the electron center diffusion h ops in LiF were always greater than those in NaH. The H atom adsorbs more s trongly on the defect free. F+ and F- surfaces of NaH relative to LiF. The reported changes in band structure due to surface imperfection explain the dramatic increase of atomic H adsorption over F and F- surfaces of LiF and NaH as well as the preferred stability of atomic H over the defect free and F+ defect containing surfaces of NaH in the course of adsorbate substrate interactions. The reported differences in properties are possibly attribute d to the differences in the lattice interionic interactions and the extende d charge distribution of the hydride anion. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.