The Medical Emergency Team: 12 month analysis of reasons for activation, immediate outcome and not-for-resuscitation orders

Objective: To describe the reasons for, and immediate outcome following Med ical Emergency Team (MET) activation. Methods: Retrospective analysis of ME T calls in 1998. Results: There were 713 MET calls to 559 in-patients. Of t he 559 patients 252 (45%) were admitted to ICU and 49 (6.9%) died during th e MET response. The three commonest criteria for calling the MET were a fal l in GCS > 2 (n = 155); a systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg (n = 142) and a respiratory rate > 35 (n = 109). Cardiac arrests accounted for 61 calls an d had an immediate mortality of 59%. The most common MET criterion associat ed with admission to ICU was a respiratory rate > 35. Of patients who recei ved MET calls based only on the 'worried' criterion 16% were admitted to IC U. The MET felt that a not-for-resuscitation order would have been appropri ate in 130 cases (23%). NFR orders were documented during 27 of the MET cal ls. Conclusions: The MET system provides objective and subjective criteria by which medical and nursing staff can identify patients who become acutely unwell. A high proportion of these patients will require admission to Inte nsive Care. The MET system also provides the opportunity to identify patien ts for whom an NFR order should be considered. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ir eland Ltd. All rights reserved.