The Human Genome Diversity Project: A case study in coproduction

Since its inception in 1991, the design of the proposed Human Genome Divers ity Project has shifted several times. However, one unchanging and central Project goal is to collect blood and other human tissue samples from 'genet ically distinct' indigenous groups around the globe. This goal has proved h ighly controversial, and the Diversity Project has thus far failed to move beyond the planning stage. In this paper I argue that the reason for the Pr oject's inconclusive and open-ended character is that project organizers ar e attempting to stabilize and control a highly contested terrain structured by emotionally and politically charged discourses. These discourses inextr icably entangle scientific and social issues including North/South relation s, colonization, intellectual property rights and the origins of human dive rsity To move forward, as the paper demonstrates, project organizers would have to negotiate these entanglements, and 'coproduce' a natural and social order that could accommodate their project. The paper explains why this pr ocess of coproduction proved to be so labour-intensive in the case of the D iversity Project, and why the Project's main responses to its critics to da te have failed to provide the tools needed to do this work.