Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels

Authors
Citation
U. Gardenfors, Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels, TREND ECOL, 16(9), 2001, pp. 511-516
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
ISSN journal
01695347 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
511 - 516
Database
ISI
SICI code
0169-5347(200109)16:9<511:CTSANV>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The World Conservation Union (IUCN) criteria for classifying threatened spe cies in Red Lists were constructed to be applied primarily on a global scal e. Nonetheless, many nature conservation efforts are conducted at national levels and there is consequently a demand for Red Lists at subglobal scales . In 1999, a working group presented draft guidelines of how to apply the I UCN criteria at such levels. Meanwhile, the 1994 IUCN criteria were the sub ject of re-evaluation, resulting in the somewhat altered 2001 IUCN criteria . Experiences of applying the suggested guidelines for national Red Lists, particularly from Sweden and Finland, revealed that the system is applicabl e to a wide range of taxa and geographical scales, even though there are is sues that remain to be resolved. A comparison of the classification outcome of species listed both at global and national levels has highlighted some incongruities.