Existing game theory on aggressive interactions associated with territory e
stablishment typically assumes that pairs of contestants engage in 'winner
takes all' fights for indivisible space. New work by Stamps and Krishnan ex
plores an alternative scenario where space use emerges from a series of agg
ressive interactions where punishment and persistence, rather than winning
per se, shape observed patterns. This new approach generates novel predicti
ons for game theory, such as the possibility of gaining space not by winnin
g, but by 'nagging'.