This study is the first to contrast two similarity theory methods, the flux
variance and the half-order time derivative, over a wide range of atmosphe
ric stability and surface roughness conditions. These two methods were sele
cted because they require only single-level temperature measurement to esti
mate sensible heat flux. The data used were collected over bare soil, a gra
ss-covered forest clearing, and an even-aged pine forest. For all three sit
es the flux variance method estimated the sensible heat flux relatively wel
l for unstable atmospheric conditions. The half-order time derivative metho
d was found to be sensitive to the parameterization of the eddy diffusivity
, especially for the grass and bare soil field sites. Overall, the flux var
iance method was able to reproduce the measured sensible heat flux with gre
ater accuracy than the half-order time derivative methods for the three exp
eriment sites.