Ed. Pisano et al., Factors affecting phantom scores at annual mammography facility inspections by the US Food and Drug Administration, ACAD RADIOL, 8(9), 2001, pp. 864-870
Rationale and Objectives. The authors performed this study to evaluate the
factors affecting phantom image score at the annual inspection of mammograp
hy facilities.
Materials and Methods. In 1997, three U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FD
A)-trained inspectors performed inspections of all mammography facilities i
n North Carolina. All federal and state inspection data were collected and
evaluated by using linear regression analysis. Factors affecting the Americ
an College of Radiology phantom scores were assessed.
Results. Phantom score was affected by inspector identity, view box luminan
ce, and optical density. All of these factors had a statistically significa
nt effect on mass score (P < .05). Inspector identity yielded a statistical
ly significant effect on speck group score, fibril score, and total score.
Luminance yielded a statistically significant effect on both speck group sc
ore and total score.
Conclusion. Phantom scoring should be automated to allow for more consisten
t interobserver scoring. In addition, radiology facilities can improve the
likelihood of receiving a passing phantom score by reducing the ambient lig
ht and increasing the view box luminance in the location where the images a
re evaluated and the phantom is scored routinely. Radiologists should also
consider increasing phantom and clinical image optical density to allow for
improved phantom testing outcomes.