Reliability of soft-copy versus hard-copy interpretation of emergency department radiographs: A prototype study

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic reliabil ity of hard-copy and soft-copy interpretation of radiographs obtained in th e emergency department using a methodology for evaluating imaging systems w hen independent proof of the diagnosis is not available. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We collected radiographs from a stratified sample of 100 patients seen in the emergency department. The images were obtained us ing computed radiography, and the digital images were printed on film and s tored for display on a workstation. A group of seven experienced radiologis ts reported the cases using both film and the workstation display. The resu lts were analyzed using mixture distribution analysis (MDA). RESULTS. The reliability expressed as the percentage of agreement of a typi cal observer relative to the majority was computed from the MDA. The result was 90% for both hard copy and soft copy with bootstrap confidence interva ls of 86-94%. CONCLUSION. We conclude that, in the emergency department, soft-copy interp retation is as reliable as hard-copy interpretation. The strength of this c onclusion depends on the validity of the MDA approach as well as the extent to which the observer sample and case sample are representative of the eme rgency department.