OBJECTIVE. We aimed to determine the positive predictive value of impaired
evacuation during evacuation proctography for the subsequent diagnosis of a
nismus..
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-one adults with signs of impaired evacuation (
defined as the inability to evacuate two thirds of a 120 mL contrast enema
within 30 sec) during evacuation proctography underwent subsequent anorecta
l physiologic testing for anismus. A physiologic diagnosis of anismus was b
ased on a typical clinical history of the condition combined with impaired
rectal balloon expulsion or abnormal surface electromyogram.
RESULTS. Twenty-eight (90%) of the 31 patients with impaired proctographic
evacuation were found to have anismus at subsequent physiologic testing. Am
ong the 28 were all 10 patients who evacuated no contrast medium and all I
I patients with inadequate pelvic floor descent, giving evacuation proctogr
aphy a positive predictive value of 90% for the diagnosis of anismus. A pro
minent puborectal impression was seen in only three subjects during proctog
raphy, one of whom subsequently showed no physiologic sign of anismus.
CONCLUSION. Impaired evacuation during evacuation proctography is highly pr
edictive for diagnosis of anismus.