The neurological outcome in head-injured patients has improved significantl
y over the last 30 years based on developments in primary care, general ICU
care and new diagnostic technologies. Basic and clinical research provided
the development of novel neuroprotective agents. However, all neuroprotect
ive agents studied thus far have failed to improve outcome in humans.
Substantial progress was made, when ICP measurement was accepted for monito
ring in severely head injured patients. Subsequently, raised intracranial p
ressure was recognized as a major problem for the treating physician. Over
the last decades, several treatment modalities have been employed, most of
them lacking rigorous evidence. It seems important to note that more than 2
0 years of basic and clinical research could not lead to a therapy which he
lps the physician to treat intracranial hypertension successfully. The deve
lopment of new means of extended intracerebral monitoring (ptiO(2), CBF, mi
crodialysis) led to a better pathophysiological understanding of basic proc
esses occurring after traumatic brain injury. Therapy begins to change its
main target. Blood flow guided treatment is a possible therapeutic strategy
of the future. However, practical guidelines have to reach widespread gene
ral acceptance so that new therapy strategies can be tested in clinical tri
als.